Genius, the figure of the artist (Art History) (comparative textual Essay

Genius, the figure of the artist (Art History) (comparative textual analysis, 1st yr undergraduate) - Essay ExampleThis paper will discuss the differences of two artists their whole kit and boodle and their quarrel for their works. It will decipher the reality of their art as well as the messages conveyed whether or non the word reflect the art or just a pigment of their imagination. It will be focused on Latin Americans Federico Uribe and Doris Salcedo, both 20th century sculptures. describe and discuss the differences regarding the figure of the artist in to each one case Doris Salcedo An artist is usually defined and remembered for their impact as well as their influences that usually will be associated with them counterbalance when they deny it. Doris Salcedo, however, emphasized the liberty of the art work (Merewether, 1180). She defined the art work further as an imposition by a reality such as the Colombian polite war, and that even the artist claimed to have been un-abl e to choose the themes that inform (1181). Salcedo added that The oft-celebrated freedom of the artist is a myth, (Merewether, 1181). For Salcedo, the artists is like an instrument, and in her case, referred to Lithuanian philosopher Emmanuel Levinas who had to respond to the urgency of its assignment and even the artists cannot make up for macrocosm tardy. Salcedo added, I am not the one who chooses my themes are given to me, reality is given to me, the presence of each victim imposes itself, (quoted by Merewether, 1181). In Unland featuring tables, the familiar becomes strange as another part of a table overlaps the other, like a fallen bridge, that needs to be fixed in order to get to the other end. Salcedo explained that Unland is about tragic heroes or victims of violence who had to endure and that in enduring, they will need to shut themselves up, be mute and unfathomed as in Franz Rosenzweigs The Star Redemption (Merewether, 1181). In the image or art work, a message is con veyed but only through conquer where the viewer can contemplate what is being communicated, the experience of the victim as something present a reality that resounds within the silence of each human being that gazes upon it, (Merewether, 1181). Here, Salcedo concluded that the work of art preserves life and that it allows another connection and interaction between two people who have different realities (Merewether, 1882). Federico Uribe Federico Uribes works provides an interesting mix of color, texture, common disposable objects and curiosity. His is identifiable and unique in a way that he will be remembered once his art was known. nonpareil does not need to extract any explanation or description of his work to classify his work as art. An artist, as described by Pressley, transcends time, and is not to copy servilely, reproducing common temper as in a Dutch still life in all its mechanical facility, but was to strive for nature perfected, le belle nature, which distilled an ideal beauty based on general principles. This high-minded art had the ethical purpose of inculcating virtue and the artist increasingly needed to adjudge against the pitfalls of a commercialized culture that would have pictures cater to private passions (15). Uribe described his initiation as an artist to be a very painful butt on of self-knowledge as it was clear what he did not want and that his evolution as an artist was sort of a reaction to this denial. Interestingly, Uribe described his works as interplay of words, up to now the process of working was slow, tedious and